Services calling back to clients
Ross Burton
ross at burtonini.com
Tue Jun 21 23:47:51 PDT 2005
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 21:21 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 16:49 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > Or expand the bindings so that server-side methods have a way of getting
> > to the message which caused their execution (interestingly bound async
> > methods can do this already through the (albeit private) context
> > structure).
>
> I'm not 100% sure I am understanding your mail correctly - is it that
> you don't have the bus name of the caller in the callee's method
> implementation?
Pretty much, yes. I was rambling quite well yesterday, sorry about
that!
When a server's method is bound, it has no way of accessing the
DBusMessage which caused it to be executed. Is this correct?
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: ross at burtonini.com
jabber: ross at burtonini.com
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
More information about the dbus
mailing list