walters at verbum.org
Thu Mar 10 09:24:41 PST 2005
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 11:59 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 09:26 -0500, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > Was the memory leak also in HEAD and now that you patched the mono
> > bindings should I do a point release of 0.31?
> Yes, the leaks were also in HEAD and I fixed them there as well. The
> only thing I wasn't sure about is whether strings extracted from
> dbus_message_iter_get_basic() need to be freed. My brief investigation
> seemed to imply that they didn't.
They're tied to the lifecycle of the message, yeah.
> Anyway, a new release would probably be a good idea sooner or later, but
> I wouldn't do a point release. It seems people have expectations of
> compatibility there, and I know that Colin has checked in additional
> work on the glib bindings. :)
The additional work has only added new API, which I'm fairly confident
we can commit to permanently.
Incidentally the latest CVS is at the point where I'd say the
client-side wrappers are "usable" in that strings actually work. I
think at this point you could quite painlessly write a D-BUS service and
client using just dbus/dbus-glib.h.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20050310/9ab7b238/attachment.pgp
More information about the dbus