glib bindings and memory management

[Colin Walters]

On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 13:04 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Maybe a general goal is consistency with the gtk introspection stuff,
> i.e. if a given IDL would map to a given C function in the new
> introspection stuff, it should be the same in the dbus case?

I'm a bit confused how this relates to the memory management issue.  Can
you elaborate?  Are you saying that e.g. we could use introspection to
find destructors for return value parameters for server-side method
invocation?  That would probably makes sense, but it still leaves us
with the problem of client-side return values.  

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20050504/3ebcfdd8/attachment.pgp