[PATCH] First pass at finishing the last major feature on the TODO list (RequestName)

[Havoc Pennington]

On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 16:49 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> I have my test case working and fixed a slew of logic bugs.  I'm going
> to add signal checking to the tests and submit a new patch on Monday.

Cool. This is a pretty nontrivial patch...

> One other thing that would be nice is to check to make sure the
> connections are in the right order in the owners list after each name
> request.  I was thinking of adding a GetNameOwners method to the bus
> which would return a list of owners, but wasn't sure if we wanted this
> as part of the spec or as something that is just added when tests are
> enabled?  Any thoughts on that? 

Seems like a reasonable feature. Maybe try to be consistent in
terminology, if we're calling it "queue" we could say GetQueuedOwners or
something.

Havoc