[PATCH] NoReply annotation in GLib bindings

[John (J5) Palmieri]

On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 22:15 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 14:44 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > Looks good to me.  Perhaps we should standardize this to
> > org.freedesktop.DBus.Method.NoReply?
> 
> That would be the only one defined without GLib in the name.  Should we
> review all of the names and categorise them into general vs
> GLib-specific?
> 
> 
> "org.freedesktop.DBus.GLib.CSymbol"
>  GLib-specific?

I would think so since this is mainly for the binding tool.  It could be
changed to org.freedesktop.DBus.C.Symbol but unless we have another tool
using it I would say leave it as is.

> "org.freedesktop.DBus.GLib.Async"
>  Glib-specific.
> 
> "org.freedesktop.DBus.GLib.Const"
>  Not sure what this does, GLib-specific I think.
> 
> "org.freedesktop.DBus.GLib.ReturnVal"
>  I can never remember what this does, glib-specific I think though.

Those all look GLib specific.

> "org.freedesktop.DBus.GLib.NoReply"
>  General I guess.
> 
> Should I commit NoReply as .Method. or .GLib.?

I would say .Method. as I could add this to the Python bindings also.
This would require a spec change if you did commit it so make sure you
do that too.  

-- 
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp at redhat.com>