Issue with _dbus_write_socket on windows

Christian Ehrlicher Ch.Ehrlicher at
Mon Dec 11 08:38:04 PST 2006

Havoc Pennington schrieb:
> Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> Havoc Pennington schrieb:
>>> I already mentioned that in another mail - you may need to write a new
>>> DBusTransport variant that uses named pipes or Windows messages. That
>>> would be cleaner and faster anyway. 
>> Christian  Ehrlicher tried to implement  named pipes and recognized that
>> there are major problems causes by the way named pipes are implemented
>> in windows.
>> Dbus transport layers are build up in all the same manner:
> ...
>> Named pipes does not have a wait function mentioned in 3.
> According to the docs there are three ways to do this:
>  - use threads
>  - WaitForMultipleObjects()
>  - WaitForSingleObjectEx()
> There are examples of all three under the "using pipes" section, the
> various ways to write a server.
All usefull examples are using overlapped functions...


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :

More information about the dbus mailing list