Issue with _dbus_write_socket on windows
Ch.Ehrlicher at gmx.de
Mon Dec 11 08:38:04 PST 2006
Havoc Pennington schrieb:
> Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> Havoc Pennington schrieb:
>>> I already mentioned that in another mail - you may need to write a new
>>> DBusTransport variant that uses named pipes or Windows messages. That
>>> would be cleaner and faster anyway.
>> Christian Ehrlicher tried to implement named pipes and recognized that
>> there are major problems causes by the way named pipes are implemented
>> in windows.
>> Dbus transport layers are build up in all the same manner:
>> Named pipes does not have a wait function mentioned in 3.
> According to the docs there are three ways to do this:
> - use threads
> - WaitForMultipleObjects()
> - WaitForSingleObjectEx()
> There are examples of all three under the "using pipes" section, the
> various ways to write a server.
All usefull examples are using overlapped functions...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20061211/4b0c4a98/signature.pgp
More information about the dbus