Errors and the introspection format

[Matthew Johnson]

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Havoc Pennington wrote:

> Possibly the NoReply annotation should have been GLib.NoReply, and
> separately we should have a Qt.Async to match the DCOP-compat kind of
> feature done in Qt bindings which is slightly different; this would also
> help clarify that NoReply is just about bindings and code generation,
> not about any intrinsic property of an interface or the wire protocol.

surely not GLib, it's useful in other bindings too.

Matt

-- 
Matthew Johnson
http://www.matthew.ath.cx/