John (J5) Palmieri
johnp at redhat.com
Tue Jun 20 07:20:26 PDT 2006
Ralf Habacker had asked for CVS access in fd.o bugzilla so he could do a
Win32 branch. I asked him to go through the patch process instead. Not
sure if you saw the reply Ralf. We don't really want to branch for
this. It should all happen in HEAD with each patch being looked at to
make sure it doesn't change the API or ABI unless it really needs to.
I'm afraid of a whole bunch of work being done, only to find out we
can't apply it.
Steps here are to get a initial patch in that enables dbus to at least
build on Win32 and get all the Win32 hackers working on the same
codebase and sending patches to the list.
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 11:49 +0100, Rob Taylor wrote:
> I'm just writing to find out the status on win32 ports of dbus. As I
> recall, there was some work being done to tidy up Tor's patches and
> bring them up to date, and it'd be interesting to hear any status on
> this plan. I'd also be interested to hear if anyone's planning on
> working on a more secure solution, perhaps using win32 pipes.
> Rob Taylor
> dbus mailing list
> dbus at lists.freedesktop.org
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp at redhat.com>
More information about the dbus