Win32 port

[Havoc Pennington]

Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Havoc Pennington writes:
>  > I would do it like this:
>  > ...
>  > You see the idea, make it a real opaque type.
> 
> Yeah, that would obviously be cleaner. When I did my porting efforts
> (Jan 2005) I didn't want to make too intrusive, API-affecting changes,
> though, assuming that would mean there would be even less chance they
> would be accepted.
> 

Please don't think that - if we have a win32 port I'd rather it was as 
maintainable as possible!

Havoc