Win32 port

Havoc Pennington hp at
Fri Jun 23 11:51:29 PDT 2006

Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Havoc Pennington writes:
>  > I would do it like this:
>  > ...
>  > You see the idea, make it a real opaque type.
> Yeah, that would obviously be cleaner. When I did my porting efforts
> (Jan 2005) I didn't want to make too intrusive, API-affecting changes,
> though, assuming that would mean there would be even less chance they
> would be accepted.

Please don't think that - if we have a win32 port I'd rather it was as 
maintainable as possible!


More information about the dbus mailing list