[PATCH] do not call _dbus_warn_check_failed on checks

uwesmail2005-lkml at yahoo.de uwesmail2005-lkml at yahoo.de
Wed Nov 15 09:22:11 PST 2006

--- Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> schrieb:

> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:11:59AM +0100, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > The low level lib remains unchanged and Daniel gets its safe
> behavior. Every 
> > body is happy :)
> Unfortunately this does mean the checks/errors/gash are maintained in
> two places, with the potential for desync.  But I'd certainly use
Do not worry! The checks in the "binding" are conceptionally.
That means, they check for all that's documented about this fuction.
Essentially a spec in source. What they declare as valid, the libdbus
function can't repudiate. (If it does, it's a compat bug in libdbus).
Of course the libdbus fuction could conceivably be extended by
defining as yet undefined behavior. But the "binding" should not
allow this through without some version check.
                                         ^ check here is used in
both Havocs and customary sense ;-). 
Of course the "binding" could make the new behavior available in
some other (new) function.
> something that isn't libdbus-1, but with no other external
> dependencies.
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> > _______________________________________________
> dbus mailing list
> dbus at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus

Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de

More information about the dbus mailing list