[PATCH] do not call _dbus_warn_check_failed on checks

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Wed Nov 15 12:30:08 PST 2006

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 09:18:55PM +0100, uwesmail2005-lkml at yahoo.de wrote:
> A real programmer knows that SIGABRT core dumps, and when
> the core limit isn't 0 (which it shouldn't be for daemons in my
> opinion)
> such a core can be loaded into gdb and even tried to continue and the
> programmer can see all the mess that would result from such an attempt.

Your mail didn't make much sense, but this part caught my eye.  The X
server is suid root for one, and secondly, if it comes down uncleanly,
on most all hardware, attempting to start it again will land you in IERR

> Huh? The USER should care about programming(!) errors? Could you choose
> something less obnoxious? Please?

'User' in this case meaning consumer, not end user.

Looking forward to the separated X server,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20061115/4de78bf6/attachment.pgp

More information about the dbus mailing list