Issue with _dbus_write_socket on windows

Daniel Stone daniel at
Sun Nov 19 10:25:37 PST 2006

On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 01:12:57PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
> >But the bigger
> >problem is - how can I avoid using the same port twice? And how can I
> >react when the port is already in use?
> I already mentioned that in another mail - you may need to write a new 
> DBusTransport variant that uses named pipes or Windows messages. That 
> would be cleaner and faster anyway. Or figure out how to define the TCP 
> stuff, I'm not sure how the X server defines it if there are multiple X 
> servers, but it could work in the same way perhaps.

6000 + display number
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :

More information about the dbus mailing list