uuid patch

Havoc Pennington hp at redhat.com
Mon Oct 2 09:17:48 PDT 2006

John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> This is very bad.  Did we remove any API or break ABI?  If not we should
> have not have upped this from 3.  The comment is wrong.  It will require
> recompile of all apps in a distribution.  Only the LT_AGE should have
> been changed.

The comment is just copied out of the libtool docs iirc. What is the 
resulting soname?

On my FC5 I have libdbus-1.so.2.0.0, and the CVS build is 3.2.0.
IIRC you had done the 2->3 bump already and it is in FC6. So this change 
is causing 3.0.0 to 3.2.0. Are you sure that causes a problem?


More information about the dbus mailing list