[patch] small fixes
John (J5) Palmieri
johnp at redhat.com
Mon Oct 23 15:38:34 PDT 2006
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 13:27 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 12:34 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> > Looks good to me.
> I've committed the patch.
> > What about the patch that allows new keys so your
> > patch doesn't break 1.0 if we want to backport later?
> I can do that. How do we want it to look? How about just denying
> activation requests if the User key is set?
Really I would have liked a namespaced parser (so we could detect errors
in a conf file at the same time allowing extensions) but in any case why
would you deny activation requests is the User key is set? I think the
idea is to just accept any key (perhaps giving a non-fatal warning for
John (J5) Palmieri <johnp at redhat.com>
More information about the dbus