OLPC and .service files in a users home directory

uwesmail2005-lkml at yahoo.de uwesmail2005-lkml at yahoo.de
Tue Oct 31 08:10:22 PST 2006


--- Havoc Pennington <hp at redhat.com> schrieb:

> uwesmail2005-lkml at yahoo.de wrote:
> > And when I have a process, that I know starts on startup, but can't
> > find in the startup editor I will think something fishy is going on
> > when it's nothing more than a service. I think we don't want the
> > numerous autostart mechanisms from windows where some program could
> > hide it's autostart in the wood of mechanisms and evade any attempt
> > to block it by the simple non-availability of a suitable editor.
> 
> This concern is a bit too abstract for me.
When a mechanism can't get an appropriate user interface, it will
mostly
be used with malevolent intent. Better not make one.
> 
> >> DBusName=org.gnome.Epiphany
> > Surely you mean
> "DBusName=/org/gnome/Application at org.gnome.Epiphany"!
> > Bus names don't have interfaces.
> 
> I would say the presence of a DBusName key would imply a standard
> object 
> path and interface implemented by the object at that path.
> 
Because that object would probably be a standard object from the
framework that implements the application, and that object would have a
different name in case the other framework is used too, I would not
use a standard name. Or it has to be implemented in the low level where
only bindings should dwell with all the issues that come from there and
clutter up this list;-)
> Havoc
> 
> 





	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de


More information about the dbus mailing list