hp at redhat.com
Wed Sep 13 11:34:02 PDT 2006
John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> So removing 3 sounds the most sane.
There's nothing to remove right - it's not in cvs, alex's latest patch
is only #4 without #3 iirc.
If you combine 1 and 2 (add recursive mutex funcs without a return
value, and leave nonrecursive mutex funcs unmodified) then there's just
a small patch to add four new funcs (recursive new/free/lock/unlock),
and prefer them if they are present (make _dbus_mutex_* choose the
recursive versions if possible).
More information about the dbus