set user id for service ?
Scott James Remnant
scott at netsplit.com
Sat Sep 16 08:01:09 PDT 2006
On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 10:49 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> What this also means is that the code for the "session programs" and the
> code for the systemwide / nobody-logged-in daemon *should* be 99% the same.
> Right now we have some historical daemons that are systemwide only and
> some historical daemons that are session only, and we need to evolve
> them toward the above goal instead.
The only piece I don't understand is why to have two separate daemons at
all. Why not just have a general "manager daemon" that sits outside the
user's session, which receives notification that users have logged in or
out, and turns on/off checking #2?
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20060916/1d4baf99/attachment.pgp
More information about the dbus