dbus_shutdown: Why do we need it?
Thiago Macieira
thiago at kde.org
Tue Sep 26 11:52:17 PDT 2006
$SUBJECT says it all: why do we need dbus_shutdown? Can we deprecate it
before 1.0, make it a dummy and remove it ASAP?
The reason I ask is because there's simply no way anyone can use it,
AFAICS. If you call it, it means you're in charge of libdbus-1 and no one
else. Which in turn makes it impossible to make your code be loadable as
a plugin.
And this is what happens with QtDBus: we call dbus_shutdown. That means
that, when the library is unloaded, it'll shut libdbus-1 down. In turn
that means that, if it was loaded because of a plugin, when the plugin is
unloaded, the application will be unable to do anymore D-Bus activity.
I'd like to remove the call, but I'd like to be reasonably sure that
there will be no ill-effects.
Obviously moving the responsibility of calling dbus_shutdown to the
application's main() function is unacceptable. If libdbus-1 requires some
kind of shut-down operation, it should register itself such with
atexit(3).
Not to mention that we no longer have a corresponding "init" function:
dbus_thread_init is now (going to be) unnecessary.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20060926/7691c048/attachment.pgp
More information about the dbus
mailing list