C convenience lib (was Re: Is dbus_pending_call_set_notify() thread safe?)

[Thiago Macieira]

nf2 wrote:
>Of course! But why can't QtDBus optionally use "gbus" or even the
>DBUS-GLib-Bindings when compiled with glib main loop integration?

Because there's no point in doing so.

1) it would be an extra library loaded. I don't want that.
2) it would provide no extra features.
3) it would provide extra work for me to maintain.
4) it _cannot_ integrate with the libdbus-glib-1 main connection *anyways* 
(read: we cannot get rid of the private connection)

All of this for something that would be better solved in libdbus-1? No, 
thanks.
-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20070801/228126e9/attachment.pgp