ATSPI over D-Bus (was Re: [Accessibility] Re: [Accessibility-atspi] D-Bus AT-SPI - The way forward )

[Thiago Macieira]

Rob Taylor wrote:
>> Let's remember that DCOP was implemented in a very short period of
>> time, and was dead simple - MUCH less complex than dbus is - and
>> people used it heavily and successfully for lots of real
>> functionality.
>
>And KDE never wrote a sucessful accessibility framework with DCOP.

The way you phrase it, it seems like DCOP is responsible for it. It's not. 
There was no accessibility framework like AT-SPI at all, nor any work to 
create it AFAIK.

However, parts of an accessibility framework, including the text-to-speech 
interface, were written and even used DCOP.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20071213/a88a2736/attachment.pgp