Beta release of the Java implementation of dbus

[Thiago Macieira]

Matthew Johnson wrote:
>  - libdbus-1 seems to insist that the first message it gets after
>    sending the Hello message is the method_return for that message. If
>    you send the NameAcquired signal first (this is how my daemon is
>    implemented) then it disconnects. Is this intentional? It will make
>    my life somewhat harder, and I don't particularly see a reason.

The Hello call is somewhat special, because you get a reply without asking 
for it -- the client hasn't yet had the chance to add the rule 
destination=':1.xxx'. In any case, it most certainly has not asked for 
any signals yet. Then again, NameAcquired and NameLost are also special 
signals, because they are directed at a specific application.

Which brings me to the question: how soon does the client have to add the 
signal rules to receive the NameAcquired, NameLost and NameOwnerChanged 
signals?

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20070102/dc4444bc/attachment.pgp