config parser

Havoc Pennington hp at
Mon Jun 25 14:13:26 PDT 2007


Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Could we apply this patch?
> We need the second NULL  because we use [1] later on.
> It also makes the code more readable.

I think two NULLs at the end is pretty weird; isn't there a better solution?

I'm not looking at the code right now, I'm on vacation until the end of 
the week.


More information about the dbus mailing list