[patch] system activation 4
hughsient at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 16:11:42 PDT 2007
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 14:28 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> I think the easiest approach to this is to build two binaries; IOW split
> into three files:
> - production main()
> - a main() that runs in 'make check' (just a binary in TESTS)
> - run_launch_helper()
> You could also put any other assorted random unit tests in the 'make
> check' binary, if that's useful.
Yes, a memcheck was a good idea, as I found 2 memory leaks in the
trivial parser when in OOM mode!
> You could just stick the 'make check' stuff in the existing bus-test
> binary, except for the conflicting symbols for the two XML parsers,
> which ends up requiring a separate binary I would think.
Mega-patch attached, there's a few things we still need to change but
it's nearly there. Yell if I've missed something.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 144126 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20070629/506a2a8d/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the dbus