Licensing issues with dbus and dbus-glib
hp at redhat.com
Fri May 18 09:18:58 PDT 2007
John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> Rhythmbox is in the process of re-licensing their codebase to GPL
> +Exception for proprietary gstreamer codec. Since GPL is incompatible
> with the AFL they can not use the AFL but since they have the exception
> clause they can not unilaterally add that exception to the GPL license
> for dbus-glib and D-Bus. Any reason why we didn't lgpl the library
The basic reason is the patent clause in the AFL. And that the AFL is
clearer/less-impossible-to-understand than LGPL, in general.
While IANAL, perhaps the libdbus situation is not different from LGPL.
The LGPL would be GPL-incompatible also, except it says in it "you can
choose to GPL instead" - i.e. basically anything under LGPL is
dual-licensed under the LGPL rules or GPL. libdbus is saying the same thing.
The solution for Rhythmbox is pretty simple though: include
libdbus-under-AFL in the exception clause. That avoids having to figure
out all the weird licensing corner cases and just makes it clearly OK.
It also avoids tracking down all the dbus contributors to change the
More information about the dbus