Spec clarification: can a signal and a method have the same name?
hp at redhat.com
Wed May 23 08:18:11 PDT 2007
I think I'd classify this as "bad idea, if only because it's unclear to
developers, but protocol does not check it so a binding could support it
if it wanted to and in any case a binding should not blow up if it sees
Similarly, I think it's a good idea to avoid *common* keywords in
*common* languages when naming stuff, and to avoid overloads. These
things just cause pain. The protocol doesn't ban any of them though.
More information about the dbus