About performance of D-Bus
Naveen Verma
ernaveenverma at gmail.com
Thu Oct 25 02:06:09 PDT 2007
Hi,
Could you please try without blocking call, by attaching a callback
function? In my understanding send_with_block() is also
not vary good for performance test.
-Br
Naveen
On 10/25/07, tian tian <mr.zoufeng at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use D-Bus as communication mechanism between processes. But
> I am not sure if it can work effectually on my PXA310(ARM, about 600MHz), so
> I did some performance test as follows:
> 1.
> Use socket to carry data form a process(client) to another
> process(server):
> client.c:
> gettimeofday()
> write() /* write 100 bytes data */
> server.c:
> read() /* read 100 bytes data */
> gettimeofday()
> The interval between the two gettimeofday() is about 180 microseconds.
>
>
> 2.
> Use D-Bus(Ver 1.0.2) to do a remote method call(peer-to-peer):
> client.c:
> main()
> {
> dbus_connection_open (CONNECTION_ADDRESS, &error);
>
> dbus_message_new_method_call()
> dbus_connection_send_with_reply_and_block()
>
> gettimeofday()
> dbus_message_new_method_call()
> dbus_message_append_args() /* append 100 bytes data as
> input parameter */
> dbus_connection_send_with_reply_and_block() /* */
> dbus_message_get_args() /* it will get 100 bytes data as
> output parameter */
> gettimeofday()
> }
> server.c:
> main()
> {
> server = dbus_server_listen (CONNECTION_ADDRESS, &error);
> dbus_server_setup_with_g_main (server, NULL);
> dbus_server_set_new_connection_function (server,
> new_connection_func, NULL, NULL);
> g_main_loop_run()
> }
> new_connection_func()
> {
> server_conn_ptr = dbus_connection_ref (conn);
> dbus_connection_setup_with_g_main( server_conn_ptr, NULL
> );
> dbus_connection_add_filter( server_conn_ptr, dbus_filter,
> loop, NULL );
> }
> dbus_filter()
> {
> /* handle & response the remote method call */
> }
> The interval between the two gettimeofday() is about 4200
> microseconds! (I tried about ten thousands, the value is quite consistent)
>
> As you can see, compared with socket, D-Bus is much slower. But the
> FAQ says D-Bus one-to-one communication was about 2.5x slower than simply
> pushing the data raw over a socket. So there must be some mistakes in my
> test program. I hope someone can help me. Many thanks!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dbus mailing list
> dbus at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dbus
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20071025/b62381f4/attachment.htm
More information about the dbus
mailing list