Ownership of DBusGProxyCall ?

[Matt Hoosier]

On 9/6/07, Havoc Pennington <hp at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/6/07, Matt Hoosier <matt.hoosier at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What are you supposed to do with this thing if you don't intend to
> > cancel the method call or synchronously block for the finish of it?
>
> You have to do one of those in order to free it, in the current API.
> cancel() doesn't not send the call, though. It just says "I don't care
> about the reply." So it is effectively just a free function. (There's
> no way to "take back" a sent message.)
>
> The docs are a bit better on dbus_pending_call_cancel() (which is the
> underlying code) while they are a bit too sketchy for
> dbus_g_proxy_cancel_call(), sorry about that.
>

Okay, thanks for the details.