ignoring a process' last words: SIGPIPE ...

[Havoc Pennington]

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Michael Meeks
<michael.meeks at novell.com> wrote:
>         The fix seems at some level sane - though - really we don't want to
>  have 2 poll records when 1 is sufficient - and if we could re-factor the
>  READ and WRITE polls into a single poll record [ as in ORBit2 ] then we
>  wouldn't need 'b)' at all. Also, peripherally, we would avoid a vicious
>  'poll' bug in some 2.4.x kernels.
>

I don't understand this btw, the poll is:
_dbus_poll (&poll_fd, 1, poll_timeout);

Is that not what you mean by poll record? It's always 1 fd we poll on, right?

Havoc