[Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Bug#510644: bluetooth.conf needs alterations for new D-Bus
walters at verbum.org
Wed Jan 7 15:40:20 PST 2009
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Simon McVittie
<simon.mcvittie at collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> As a solution for the current release of BlueZ, assuming that rethinking
> the Agent API completely is not an option, does the proposed policy at
> need to be vetoed? It seems to me to be non-ideal, but the best we can get
> right now; but I still don't fully understand the D-Bus policy language (I'm
> not convinced anyone does...) so I could be wrong.
I think that policy is "ok"; but not ideal as you say. It seems
extremely unlikely to me that it would introduce any security problem.
Regardless hopefully bluez can move to signals over a transition
More information about the dbus