dbus 1.2.16

Scott James Remnant scott at canonical.com
Wed Jul 15 02:57:23 PDT 2009


On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 23:38 +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:

> I'd also like to point out that the fd-passing stuff should not go into 
> 1.2. It should go into master, which will end up in the 1.4.0 release[*]. 
> So we should start creating a timeline for 1.4: if OSX and Windows 
> features want to be in 1.4, they'll have to be merged into master before a 
> deadline. Otherwise, they'll be on hold until 1.6.
> 
> [*] As soon as we merge the fd-passing, I propose we release 1.3.0 (marked 
> unstable).
> 
Is there any particular reason to not commit the fd patches today?

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott at canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20090715/0fc9a16c/attachment.pgp 


More information about the dbus mailing list