[PATCH 0/5] Support service activation through Upstart
mzqohf at 0pointer.de
Thu Dec 23 06:58:36 PST 2010
On Thu, 23.12.10 14:42, Scott James Remnant (scott at netsplit.com) wrote:
> > Now after all that you do want this kind of activation hookup for
> > upstart too, and now want to litter the D-Bus source code with multiple
> > implementations which happen to be almost entirely identical except that
> > a few strings are named differently.
> No, I was just too busy - and by the time I dug myself out of the TODO
> list, you'd already sent in your own patches. Note that I have at
> least tried to clean up your patch so it's at least a case of
> extending an enum rather than extra arguments.
Ah, because my patch was so "dirty" you cleaned it up? Thanks for that,
> And I have at no point said I'm not interested in defining common
Oh, you have said it very explcitly a couple of times, and IIRC in your
recent Upstart videocall thingy, too.
> all I've said is that I'm not interested in using your
> interfaces as the common spec. I'm more than happy to sit down and
> work something else that's fresh.
Got it, you are happy to agree on common interfaces, as long as it is
not me who came up with them. Very grown up.
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the dbus