releases

[Christian Dywan]

Am Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:50:23 +0200
schrieb Lennart Poettering <mzqohf at 0pointer.de>:

> On Mon, 07.06.10 13:59, Christian Dywan (christian at lanedo.com) wrote:
> 
> > I would like to see the negotiation changes and Maybe types in 1.4
> > because the current negotiation is completely unflexible. Those
> > go intuitively hand in hand I think, so it makes a lot of sense to
> > me, in terms of having 2 types to actually make use of the more
> > flexible negotiation. That said, if it is clearly voted against, I
> > am also
> 
> What is wrong with the current negotiation? It's perfectly streamable
> and leaves room open for future addition of negotation arguments. What
> do you want?

Have a look at the comments in bug #27857. Basically adding a
new feature right now means repeating the whole negotiation with
commands specific to the new feature. So what I would like to see is
being able to handle any number of features in one go.

-- 
ciao,
    Christian