PropertiesChanged signal

[Will Thompson]

On 10/05/10 20:06, David Zeuthen wrote:
> I mean, we can make it as complicated as we want to.... But I don't
> think we should... Because from a 50,000 feet point of view, I'd like
> to think that if you have a D-Bus interface where you elect to not use
> PropertiesChanged for a property, chances are high that you can
> require custom code at the client side for handling properties anyway.

Yep, I agree. It's not worth complicating the simple cases in the hope 
of avoiding custom code, because it'll probably be needed anyway.

(Much as I'd like maybe types... ☺)

-- 
Will