PropertiesChanged signal, take 2
zeuthen at gmail.com
Wed May 12 09:45:31 PDT 2010
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Colin Walters <walters at verbum.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, David Zeuthen <zeuthen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey again,
>> Here's take two of the PropertiesChanged spec patch reworked after
>> review here on the list (thanks guys!). Notes:
> This looks fine to me in general. You need to bump the
> <releaseinfo>, and while we don't have a formal mechanism for this
> it'd be good to add a note like "This signal was added in version
(I think you meant 0.14 because that's what I bumped the version to.
It was at 0.13 already.)
OK, I committed the attached patch (which contains the change Thiago
wanted; one annotation instead of two). I included a lot of the
information in this thread in the commit summit.
What's the process for uploading the spec it so it's accessible when visiting
which is 0.12? (this one is pretty ancient... it doesn't mention
nonce-tcp: for instance)
> Looking at the spec, I wonder if any existing binding actually looks
> at the NoReply annotation at runtime. I highly doubt it...
Well, NoReply only means the _service_ won't reply. Callers always
need to check for a reply. For starters, the bus might cut you off....
if it runs out of memory or resources.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3991 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the dbus