User bus conclusion

[Matthew Johnson]

On Wed Nov 10 08:04, David Zeuthen wrote:
> The main point, I think, is that the newly proposed USER bus and the
> existing SESSION bus are two different things. Sure, adding a new bus
> type adds complexity but the world _is_ that complex.. e.g. GVfs and
> org.fd.Notifications are two very different users of D-Bus.. the
> former _really_ wants the (user, machine) thing and the latter really
> wants to be run _per_ login session (including ssh(1) logins)... I
> don't see the point in hiding this complexity. Instead, we should
> embrace it and explain people, by example, how and when to use the
> various bus types.

+1

Matt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20101110/6f85e934/attachment-0001.pgp>