Being interested in NameOwnerChanged for a namespace, not one name
hp at pobox.com
Fri Sep 17 17:16:08 PDT 2010
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel at holtmann.org> wrote:
> I personally think that this design of waiting for bus names, object
> path or interface names with a well defined prefix is wrong anyway. That
> is why I have never resorted to this. I am using an active registration
> process where the client has to register with the central server. That
> way it learns the bus name of the client and can track its lifetime.
I guess I agree that this is how I would have done it. With gdbus
making it easier to get right, it's an even clearer choice.
More information about the dbus