Floating-point and mixed-endianness in D-Bus (was: dbus mini-summit)

Colin Walters walters at verbum.org
Wed Aug 10 03:16:06 PDT 2011


2011/8/9 Havoc Pennington <hp at pobox.com>:
>
> As always my bias is "make changes to the protocol only if it seems
> really important to do so" and this seems like a toss-up at best. The
> essence of when the CADT criticism (http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html)
> truly applies is when "basically a toss up" judgment calls get
> reversed back and forth over the years.

In the discussion we had these kind of incompatible changes were a not
a focus, just "if we were to do a 2.0" thing.


More information about the dbus mailing list