a message header flag for interactive authentication?

[Thiago Macieira]

On Wednesday 27 August 2014 10:41:02 Alban Crequy wrote:
> I would prefer if the headers are not too difficult to parse if not
> necessary. At the moment, the headers don't have any "body offset" field
> to know where the body of the message starts. So any implementation
> would need to parse the header completely, even if it is not interested
> in everything. Adding a "(sv)" means there could be more variants to
> parse recursively.

So what do you recommend instead?
-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358