Starting the kdbus discussions

[Kevin Krammer]

On Monday, 2013-12-30, 04:50:21, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sun, 29.12.13 20:42, Ted Gould (ted at gould.cx) wrote:

> > Not everyone who connects to DBus uses GDBus.  Optimizing the service
> > for a particular client library seems odd.  And it seems odd to say that
> > "this is DBus" with a different serialization format.
> 
> There are nowadays pretty much exactly three bus libraries in use:
> libdbus1, gdbus and libsystemd-bus (the latter currently only used by
> systemd). The other libraries are either wrappers around libdbus1 or not
> really maintained anymore, enough that I am happy to ignore them here.

I was under the impression that the client libraries for managed languages 
(e.g. C#, Java) had native implementations from socket upwards.

The author and maintainer of the Java bindings was still actively reacting to 
developer questions in September, which would indicate that these bindings are 
being actively used and supported.

Cheers,
Kevin

-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20140101/799ac000/attachment.pgp>