<html><head></head><body><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Le lundi 18 juillet 2016 à 09:15 -0700, Thiago Macieira a écrit :</div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On segunda-feira, 18 de julho de 2016 11:08:37 PDT Jean Parpaillon wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Thanks for the tip.</div><div>Answer is: always pad, even with 0-size array.</div><div>Test code in attachment.</div><div>I think I've fixed dbus-java code in https://github.com/jeanparpaillon/</div><div>dbus-java</div><div>Would be glad to push into the right repository, but freedesktop one</div><div>does not seem to be up-to-date (no 2.8 tag).</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You created that tag two weeks ago. No wonder that it's not in the upstream </div><div>source. Why are you creating tags in a downstream repository?</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I understand it seems weird :) </div><div>According to Debian (<a href="https://packages.debian.org/sid/dbus-java-bin"><a href="https://packages.debian.org/sid/dbus-java-bin">https://packages.debian.org/sid/dbus-java-bin</a> </a> ), there is 2.8 upstream tag somewhere and upstream website always point to freedesktop.</div><div>I may be wrong but I haven't seen any 2.8 tag on freedesktop git.</div><div>So I've cloned fdo git and applied the diffs between 2.7 (last tag on fdo) and upstream 2.8 according to Debian.</div><div><br></div><div>I understand it's confusing and it could be really nice to ensure that dbus-java on fdo is up-to-date.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><span><pre><pre>-- </pre>Jean Parpaillon -- Open Source Consultant Director @ OW2 Consortium OCCIware Strategic Orientation Committee Chairman Research Engineer @ Inria -- Phone: +33 6 30 10 92 86 im: jean.parpaillon@gmail.com skype: jean.parpaillon linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeanparpaillon/en</pre></span></div></body></html>