DeviceKit-power release next Monday

Mikhail Gusarov dottedmag at dottedmag.net
Tue Oct 6 17:02:18 PDT 2009


Twas brillig at 19:40:48 06.10.2009 UTC-04 when david at fubar.dk did gyre
and gimble:

 DZ> Applications (that are not disk utility, partitioning etc. apps)
 DZ> should just be using the GIO API since it's simpler and do what
 DZ> they need (discover/watch mounts). Or, of course, similar APIs if
 DZ> you use other toolkits than the G stack.

As involved in E stack, I should comment this leats to major PitA:
either you need to keep code to talk to different versions of DK-[dp]
(== bloat) or to restrict your libraries to a limited set of versions of
DK-[dp] (== useless).

 DZ> GLib and/or Gtk+ would also provide implementations on Win32/OS
 DZ> X/whatever that uses the appropriate OS specific stuff.

So D-Bus DK-[dp] protocol is considered internal? D-Bus becomes just a
mechanism for privilege separation and interaction with PolicyKit, and
not a, uhm, service bus.

-- 
  http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/attachments/20091007/f4b80423/attachment.pgp 


More information about the devkit-devel mailing list