[PATCH v3] allow disabling ACL
Peter Wu
lekensteyn at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 07:08:13 PDT 2014
Hi David,
The overall patch looks fine to me, but it got mangled by your mail
client. Some minor nitpicks/comment below.
On Friday 04 April 2014 15:47:56 David Heidelberger wrote:
> From 310d26a9ad845c0a320692c873562b37c94cd102 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Heidelberger <david.heidelberger at ixit.cz>
> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:28:42 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH v3] allow disabling ACL
>
> This patch provide option to build and run udisks without ACL.
> v2: as replacement of ACL is used chown call
> v3: do not change uid, change gid
> ---
> configure.ac | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> src/udiskslinuxfilesystem.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 3a39b5a..e656abf 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -174,18 +174,31 @@ if test "x$with_systemdsystemunitdir" != "xno";
> then
> fi
> AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_SYSTEMD, [test -n "$systemdsystemunitdir"])
>
> -# libacl
> -AC_CHECK_HEADERS(
> - [sys/acl.h acl/libacl.h],
> - [ACL_CFLAGS=""],
> - AC_MSG_ERROR([*** ACL headers not found.]))
> -AC_CHECK_LIB(
> - [acl],
> - [acl_get_file],
> - [ACL_LIBS="-lacl"],
> - AC_MSG_ERROR([*** libacl not found.]))
> -AC_SUBST(ACL_CFLAGS)
> -AC_SUBST(ACL_LIBS)
> +have_acl=no
> +AC_ARG_ENABLE(acl, AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-acl], [disable acl
> support]))
> +if test "x$enable_acl" != "xno"; then
> + AC_CHECK_HEADERS(
> + [sys/acl.h acl/libacl.h],
> + [
> + AC_CHECK_LIB(
> + [acl],
> + [acl_get_file],
> + [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_ACL, 1, [Define if libacl is
> available]) have_acl=yes],
> + have_acl=no)
> + ],
> + have_acl=no)
> + if test "x$have_acl" = "xyes"; then
> + ACL_CFLAGS=""
> + ACL_LIBS="-lacl"
> + fi
> + AC_SUBST(ACL_CFLAGS)
> + AC_SUBST(ACL_LIBS)
> + if test "x$have_acl" = xno -a "x$enable_acl" = xyes; then
> + AC_MSG_ERROR([acl support requested but libraries not found])
> + fi
> +fi
> +AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_ACL, [test "$have_acl" = "yes"])
> +
>
> # Internationalization
> #
> @@ -232,6 +245,7 @@ echo "
> udevdir: ${udevdir}
> systemdsystemunitdir: ${systemdsystemunitdir}
> using libsystemd-login: ${have_libsystemd_login}
> + acl support: ${have_acl}
Shouldn't this be indented with spaces?
>
> compiler: ${CC}
> cflags: ${CFLAGS}
> diff --git a/src/udiskslinuxfilesystem.c b/src/udiskslinuxfilesystem.c
> index f243046..0b9bdbf 100644
> --- a/src/udiskslinuxfilesystem.c
> +++ b/src/udiskslinuxfilesystem.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <mntent.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> +#ifdef HAVE_ACL
> #include <sys/acl.h>
> +#endif
> #include <errno.h>
>
> #include <glib/gstdio.h>
> @@ -795,7 +797,7 @@ ensure_utf8 (const gchar *s)
> }
>
> /*
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> */
> -
Can this new line be kept?
> +#ifdef HAVE_ACL
> static gboolean
> add_acl (const gchar *path,
> uid_t uid,
> @@ -831,7 +833,7 @@ add_acl (const gchar *path,
> acl_free (acl);
> return ret;
> }
> -
> +#endif
Can there be a newline after this?
> /*
> * calculate_mount_point: <internal>
> * @dameon: A #UDisksDaemon.
> @@ -911,7 +913,11 @@ calculate_mount_point (UDisksDaemon
> *daemon,
> }
> }
> /* Then create the per-user /run/media/$USER */
> +#ifdef HAVE_ACL
> if (g_mkdir (mount_dir, 0700) != 0)
> +#else
> + if (g_mkdir (mount_dir, 0750) != 0)
It does not look aligned, is there a tab/space mismatch here?
> +#endif
> {
> g_set_error (error,
> UDISKS_ERROR,
> @@ -921,7 +927,11 @@ calculate_mount_point (UDisksDaemon
> *daemon,
> goto out;
> }
> /* Finally, add the read+execute ACL for $USER */
> +#ifdef HAVE_ACL
> if (!add_acl (mount_dir, uid, error))
> +#else
> + if (chown (mount_dir, -1, gid) == -1)
add_acl seems to report an error if something fails, wouldn't that also
be useful here?
> +#endif
> {
> if (rmdir (mount_dir) != 0)
> udisks_warning ("Error calling rmdir() on %s: %m",
> mount_dir);
>
Kind regards,
Peter
More information about the devkit-devel
mailing list