[PATCH v2] doc: clarify the target audience for the status command

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 03:36:20PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> 'dim status' is intended to be used by maintainers and not by commiters.
> Move the description of the subcommand into the 'COMMANDS FOR MAINTAINERS'
> area and clarify in the COMMITERS area that they should use vanilla
> 'git status' for checking the health of the branch.
> 
> v2: Fix duplicate 'status' warnings by merging the text into the 'COMMANDS
> FOR MAINTAINERS' description.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau at arm.com>

lgtm, applied and thanks for the patch.
-Daniel

> ---
>  dim.rst | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/dim.rst b/dim.rst
> index f7ca4ebdf0ebe..a99e40678a2f0 100644
> --- a/dim.rst
> +++ b/dim.rst
> @@ -108,10 +108,6 @@ update-branches
>  Updates all maintainer branches. Useful to synchronize all branches when other
>  maintainers and committers pushed patches meanwhile.
>  
> -status
> -------
> -Lists all branches with unmerged patches, and how many patches are unmerged.
> -
>  cd
>  --
>  Changes the working directory into the git repository used by the last previous
> @@ -288,6 +284,15 @@ cherry-pick them to drm-intel-fixes or drm-intel-next-fixes. These commands use
>  dim cherry-pick internally to make sure bugfixes for fixes are cherry-picked
>  too.
>  
> +status
> +------
> +Lists all branches with unmerged patches, and how many patches are unmerged. It
> +will show how the overall subsystem tree looks like and where patches waiting to
> +be merged have been added, in order to help maintainers with deciding which tree
> +is in need of a pull request. Commiters that want to check the status of their
> +current branch should use normal **git status** commands.
> +
> +
>  pull-request *branch* *upstream*
>  --------------------------------
>  Fetch the *upstream* remote to make sure it's up-to-date, create and push a date
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch