[PATCH] dim: add additional prompts for pushing merges

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Wed Aug 11 14:05:35 UTC 2021


On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 01:49:34PM +0000, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 13:58 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > It's not exactly trivial to add the smarts to properly check for
> > pushing
> > backmerges, rebases, topic branches and subtree branches (such as
> > gvt). For a start, prompt the user with hints about what's going on.
> > 
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Untested.
> > ---
> >  dim | 14 ++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/dim b/dim
> > index 56463eb0c0a6..9fc2d78b8617 100755
> > --- a/dim
> > +++ b/dim
> > @@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ function checkpatch_commit_push_range
> >  # push.
> >  function dim_push_branch
> >  {
> > -       local branch remote committer_email count
> > +       local branch remote committer_email commit_count merge_count
> >  
> >         branch=${1:?$usage}
> >         shift
> > @@ -1004,9 +1004,15 @@ function dim_push_branch
> >  
> >         # Apart from maintainers pushing merges or rebases, most
> > patches should
> >         # be pushed in small batches.
> > -       count=$(git rev-list --count --first-parent
> > "$branch@{u}..$branch")
> > -       if [[ $count -gt 10 ]]; then
> > -               if ! ask_user "Pushing $count commits. Are you
> > sure?"; then
> > +       commit_count=$(git rev-list --count --no-merges --first-
> > parent "$branch@{u}..$branch")
> > +       merge_count=$(git rev-list --count --merges --first-parent
> > "$branch@{u}..$branch")
> > +       if [[ $merge_count -gt 0 ]]; then
> > +               if ! ask_user "Pushing $merge_count merges and
> > $commit_count non-merge commits. Merges should only be pushed by
> > maintainers. Are you sure?"; then
> 
> With our flow of drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next, there are a few
> cases where it is much easier a topic branch to get merged to both.
> 
> On a recent case I asked Matt Roper to go ahead and merge to both
> directly since I was sure that all of them had the same base and all
> patches really ready for merge.
> 
> Are we going to block cases like this and force pull request on all
> kind of topic branches? or with the right maintainer acks we can
> get this path and then we'd need to adjust this message?

Ignore me.
I just got to the other thread and saw the problem I caused. I'm sorry.

Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>

> 
> > +                       echoerr "NOTE: Branch not pushed."
> > +                       return 1
> > +               fi
> > +       elif [[ $commit_count -gt 10 ]]; then
> > +               if ! ask_user "Pushing $commit_count commits. Commits
> > should be only be pushed in relatively small batches. Are you sure?";
> > then
> >                         echoerr "NOTE: Branch not pushed."
> >                         return 1
> >                 fi
> 


More information about the dim-tools mailing list