Intel graphics CPU usage - SDVO detect bogosity?
Andy Lutomirski
luto at myrealbox.com
Sun Aug 15 21:06:03 PDT 2010
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I started wondering why 'top' was showing an otherwise idle system as
> having a load average of 0.5+, and worker threads constantly using the
> CPU.
>
> So I did a system-wide profile, and got the attached output (look at
> it in a really wide terminal).
>
> There seems to be something _seriously_ wrong with i915 SDVO detect.
> This is on an Apple Mac Mini (hey, your favorite problem child!), and
> apparently it spends 20% of its non-idle CPU time just doing udelay's
> for the i2c SDVO connection detection.
You might be hitting the infamous hotplug storm [1]. The symptoms vary
by kernel version.
2.6.34 and before: udevadm --monitor shows craploads of events and, as
long as X is running, X keeps reprobing the outputs which (depending on
the particular bug) can suck cpu in the i2c code or cause more hotplug
events. It also makes X oddly laggy.
2.6.35 and newer: The kernel is smart enough to probe outputs itself
before telling X, so the events never hit userspace. But things still
can get a bit laggy.
Anyone know why merely *reading* /sys/class/drm/whatever/status causes
the output to get probed? (I see it in the code, but I have no idea why
that code's still there after most of the rest of the hotplug code got
cleaned up in 2.6.36).
Once I find some free time, I plan on trying to at least fix the issue
that causes this bug for me. (It's apparently quite nontrivial due to
silliness in the way dock/undock (!) works on some laptops.)
[1] for example:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org/msg00921.html
>
> That sounds a bit wrong, doesn't it?
>
> I don't know how recent this is - it might have been going on for some
> time without me noticing. It's the wife's computer, and the same thing
> doesn't seem to happen on my Core i5 desktop
>
> Any ideas? Any information I can give about the machine?
If I'm right, the outputs of intel_bios_dumper and intel_bios_reader
could be instructive (both are in intel-gpu-tools).
You could also try intel_reg_write 0x61110 0x0 and see if the problem
stops (at least until a suspend/resume cycle). That command turns off
output hotplug on the card, which has the side effect that the kernel
will stop acting on bogus interrupts.
--Andy
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list