[now bisected] i915: 2.6.36-rc2 hoses my Intel display

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:55:54 +0100
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> In threes. Hmm, one for primary, cursor and self-refresh. drm.debug=0xe
> would be interesting to see what the pixel clock is.
> 
> Can you grab one before the bad commit and one after? If there is a change
> that may help pin-point the mistake. Or indicate further problems...

OK, three files attached; drm.good is from 2.6.35, drm.bad is from
2.6.36-rc2.  I also stripped the times and did a diff, in case that's
useful.

If you'd like output from right around the bad commit, say the word;
that will take a bit of building time (I didn't keep all those bisect
kernels around) but I can do it.

Thanks,

jon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: drm.good
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 32898 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20100824/43973a5d/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: drm.bad
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 34704 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20100824/43973a5d/attachment-0003.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: drm.diff
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20100824/43973a5d/attachment-0001.txt>