[00/66] 22.214.171.124-stable review
bskeggs at redhat.com
Tue Dec 7 21:17:20 PST 2010
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 11:15 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Greg KH <gregkh at suse.de> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 09:24:05AM -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> Greg KH wrote:
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 126.96.36.199 release.
> >>> There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>> let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and
> >>> wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >> Can you add ab838338a2a9e0cb8346eb0cab9977be13e8dce5? (Somehow the cc:
> >> stable got eaten, but 2.6.36 definitely needs this one. 2.6.35 probably
> >> does as well but I haven't tested it.)
> > Please get an ack from the maintainer of that driver and the drm
> > maintainer so that I can apply it to the next .36 queue.
Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
> Can you ack this for 2.6.36, please?
> I suspect that 2.6.35 needs it as well, but I won't be able to test on
> my NV50 machine for two weeks (I'll be out of town, and I don't have
> fancy enough remote control over that box to boot suspected-bad
> kernels remotely).
More information about the dri-devel