[git pull] drm for 2.6.35-rc1 (revised)

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Linus,

On Fri, 21 May 2010 11:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I suspect we should have some "new warnings are errors" thing for 
> linux-next, so that people can't do this.

I do attempt to report new warnings but they are often hard to spot among
all the "may be used uninitialised" rubbish of an X86_64 allmodconfig
build.  Also, sometimes people ignore me, of course. :-(

That being said, I did not get the mentioned warning for either an i386
or x86_64 allmodconfig build - I wonder why not?  Compiler differences?
Config differences? (See
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/2617918/ and
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/2617928/).

Ah, I did get it for an i386 defconfig build
(http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/2617930/).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20100522/3bfcba49/attachment.pgp>