[PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up

Nick Bowler nbowler at elliptictech.com
Mon Nov 22 07:17:23 PST 2010

On 2010-11-21 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yes, I'd be ok with UDF doing a "select BKL" along with a "default n"
> for BKL itself.
> I think UDF currently is the only sane reason to have BKL enabled any
> more, and yes, it would probably make it easier to configure things.

UFS (which I use) also relies on BKL.

Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)

More information about the dri-devel mailing list