2.6.39-rc5-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.38
Linus Torvalds
torvalds at linux-foundation.org
Sat Apr 30 13:50:04 PDT 2011
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34012
> Subject : 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists at nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2011-04-22 1:57 (9 days old)
> Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1104211841510.18728 at trent.utfs.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130343744622331&w=2
Judging by the extended debug info in:
http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.39-rc4/oom/
(The -9 files are the current ones)
that thing shows a _lot_ of xfs inodes:
xfs_inode 479187 479187 1120 14 4 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 34329 34329 0
even though there aren't that many dentries (each inode should have at
least one dentry associated with it under normal circumstances):
dentry 97896 97900 160 25 1 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 3916 3916 0
and then later when the system gets low on memory, the dentries shrink:
dentry 1017 3525 160 25 1 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 141 141 0
but the XFS inodes do not:
xfs_inode 557579 557579 1120 14 4 : tunables 0
0 0 : slabdata 41492 41492 0
so I suspect it's some kind of XFS inode leak.
Linus
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list